Inside of my psyche there are two "people" manifesting politically, most of the times they can be in disagreement, one is a reformist, an idealist that hopes for a better future and the other is an accelerationists that wants to see the world burn and be reborn in a mystic fire. I am certain I'm not a revolutionary because revolutions can be easy to steal from the revolutionaries (Romanian Revolution) or revolutions eat their own children (French Revolution).
Today I want to explore the latter side of me, the wicked one.
Accelerationism in the general sense is an ideology or way of thinking that wants to accelerate some things in order to achieve societal collapse so we can start all over again and hopefully do better this time around. Take it as.. there is a moldy house, is it worth to try to renovate it? or should we just burn it to the ground and build another. This ideal applied to politics is accelerationism.
Accelerationism comes in many flavours and forms, originally a marixst idea that said capitalist internal contradictions will eventually lead to it's deemise in favour of scientific socialism or dictatorship of the proletariat. It eventually also was adopted by certain far right groups pushing the idea of accelerating social degeneration and degradation until societal collapse so that afterwards we can have a traditionalist utopia.
I am not immune to this way of thinking rather when things seems to losse all hope I rather use it as a coping mechanism "it's not the end".
Accelerationism for me it's in relation to achive a technocratic subsidiar system of governance throughout all the means neccesary, it is deeply tied to an idea of paleogenesis and my relationship with European values, but also with a specific way of processing history "History does not repeat itself but it must certainly rhime".
Recently in history class we started learning about the history of the European Union but the lectures also had a propagandistic element in order to perpetuate the so called "European Values" they are quite vague principles like respecting human rights democracy and peace but the way they are presented it shows that only throughout the European Union they can exist in europe. This way they rather become dogmas and it's quite dangerous to make a dogma out of human rights peace and especially democracy.
Despite considering myself an european confederalist, I am in slight to radical disagreement with some of those values or they way they could be approached.
Here my disagreement is slight to none with the European values, the basic human rights everyone agrees with and are known like the right to live, to freely associate, to freely express yourself and so on I fully agree, the problem with human rights is when people in general associate them with goods that are not immune to scarcity, socialists are the most guilty of this, there is no right to food or shelter but there is a right to private property and work, it is arbitrary to say otherwise.
Now the problem with the European Union I have here is their hypocrisy, the people that have in their mouths human rights and democracy wanted to implement chat control, a violation of the human right to privacy and we are still uncertain if it will be implemented or not.
Chat control was proposed by the European commission this year and it has sparked controversy, it is essentially an artificial intelligence that will scan all private messages and it forces encrypted messaging providers to give a backdoor to the governments for supposedly the safety of the children,
"think of the children!". This is part of a bigger wave of mass survailance in the governments of the world like digital ID verification.
Here the Europeans are hypocrites and are laying the first steps for a survailance state.
Democracy is dying and we are it's murders. Democracy like a false god while it is decaying it continues to be worshipped. This is quite dangerous because in the near future with the 4th industrial revolution democracy will become impossible, not that it isn't mathematically impossible already but that's a subject for another essay in which I'll go into more details but until then....
To give my view of democracy, I see it as an utopic ideal that lead to a more function dystopia than the others, or as a failed God.
With the rise of ai, the 4th industrial revolution I don't think democracy can work even theoretically if by democracy we understand a electoral process. This truly started with the rise of algorithms, shortform content and the ability of the oligarchs to control information.
Democracy eventually leads to the oligarchy of parties, it is truly baffling to me that some people think that when a two party system emerges naturally in a democratic society it is seen as an advanced democracy, like the USA , this can be also seen in less advanced democracies like Romania with the PSD-PNL oligarchs, many parties here but the same people that essentially migrate to other parties, eat them or are always in a coalition, or they create anex parties so they can play both sides.
This also translates economically for example Facebook has the monopoly of attention on bombers and older folk, while Instagram has one over adults and tik tok over kids and young adults. It is truly easy for oligarchs to work together, change their dogmas too, see what happens in the Trump administration now and the CEOs of major companies licking his boot while in the campaign they were "censoring him".
I could go further into why democracy should not become a dogma , for example, how is it logical that a business owner, an university teacher, a political analyst and the local town junkey have the same decisional power in elections? And that it is easier to manipulate an colective than a individual. but I'll stop here.
If by democracy we understand it ethimologically , as the power of the people then I'm all for it, but power of the people does not necessarily mean elections.
I believe that people should not have the right to ellect their representatives but they should have all the rights to dissmiss them. By heaving them elect their representatives, representatives chosen by political parties (the oligarchs) you only give legitimacy to the oligarchy. legitimacy should come from not being dissmissed from your position, this keeps you in fear of the community in a good way, it forces you to do the best job you can.
But how do we put people in positions of power then? Simply the state should follow and adopt market principles.
Contest over elections.
A comision shall be made one of the most intelectual people from the community, business owners, teachers, philosophers, collage graduates that will decide who wins the contest.
The local council should be made up of the most important people of the community, some kind of local corporatism if you will, the business owners, the teachers or a representative of them, representatives or leaders of syndicate of workers from respective fields and why not the local priests?
The council should have a legislative and counciling role throughtout devolution from the county state that essentially gets it's devolution directly from a parliament
The mayor put on contest should have executive role and to approve proposed legislation of the councils
The mayor should be apart of a local county council of Mayors and throughtout contest the leader of a regional council and then apart of a national one. And throughout contest the leader of the nation.
I have already explained how this system works in structure but I belive it needs a follow up in the future.
Peace at any price, at all costs is a foolish ideal...why? Beacuse lasting peace can only be procted throughout wars.
In the interbelic period we wanted peace at any price and it has lead to the deaths of millions throughout war or genocide.
My romanian, serbian, croatian , bosnian, montengro readers, we were not above in thinking here, it is equally our fault also, remember? We were in something called the little entente? To protect our borders and peace against any state especially Hungary with the help of France? Alright let's say there was tehnically no war declared but then Hitler occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia in march 1939, a war! We are equally as coward as France and Great Brittain equally as traitors to Czechoslovakia as the great powers were traitors to Poland.
Now speaking of Poland, the domino piece that started the war on paper, Germany attacked Poland under false claims that they have attacked them first on Semptember 1 1939 and it took two days for the great powers to declare war on Germany but in reality the French just waited around, Hitler told it's commanders that if one fire was shoot from France (if they invaded) they shall retreat, it was a moral betrayel one that lead to things taking an ugly turn of events when the Soviets also invaded Poland...they stood no chance. But another act of betrayel and cowardness, Poland and France had a military alliane signed in 1921 and reaffirmed in the 1930's why then did the great powers not also declare war on the Soviet Union? The acts put in place to protect peace were also put in practice halfy.Peace can only be protected throughout war!
Oh only if the great liberal powers defenders of peace and democracy knew how bad hitler will be, his plans...it's not like he wrotte a book mein kamfp(my struggle) before all of this in 1924-1925 but whatever right? maybe they did not have a reason to read it, so oblivious....but then what about the Trial of Neumman and Sass that happend in 1934-1935 the biggest legal trial in the history of Lithuania in which a member of an nazi group in the region Klaipėda was accused of activities against the Lithuanian state. This has lead to a purge of tens of local nazi groups connected to nazi germany and it's future plans
But now let's take Romania in the interbelic period as a case study, here we were too preocupied eating eachother alive once our folks everlasting goal of uniting all to most romanian majority lands under one flag to notice the outside tensions or God forbid to actually defend our so fought for borders.
The coward King Carol the second wanting to be a dictator was more preocupied on making Romania an one party state and assasinating and aresting oposition than to build a military seeing the outside tensions.In june 28, 1940 Romania lost Basarabia to the USSR accepting an ultimatum from the Soviets without one bullet beeing shot afterwards in the same year we lost Northern Transylvania to Hungary in august 30 with the Vienna Award in which Nazi Germany and Italy gave us an ultimatum and we accepted it without a bullet shot. All of this as a ressult of not backing Czechoslovakia when Hitler invaded it before, it showed weakness and cowardness and the nazis and communist caught on. Oh..if we had a strong army!
All of this lead to the radicalization of most of the population and intelectuals in the country into becoming legionares, some of them latter regretting like Emil Cioran. We had a relatively strong army afterwards but under the fascists, under Antonescu beeing the second most important army and source of resources (oil) for operation Barbaroasa.
After the war we fell into the hands of the communists, why should the great liberal powers defenders of democracy and peace want to save us when we only fought against the nazis latter into the war as traitors trying to pull another ww1 move of beeing on the side of the winners as the loosers. It doesn't work two times, but at least King Michael was more vissionary and beacuse we swiched sides Stalin gave us north Transylvania to punish Hunagary for fighthing with the fascists until the end.
All problems of modern day Romania can be blaimed on one man and that man is not Ceausescu it is Carol the coward.
The naive foolish Europenist approach to peace have changed only a little ever since, still stuck in the 30's trying to defend peace at all costs but now seeing the situation in Ukraine with Russia we are fighting a cold war, more likely the cold war never stopped but America is getting tired of it. We are trying to fight a war indirectly...but is this really peace?
Moreso on the other side Russia has an ally that defacto has a monopoly on the global means of production..Socialism with Chinese characteristics (corporatism) has sized the means of production quite literally. All beacuse of the liberal inertia regarding peace we are fighting a cold war and we are loosing it.
The coldness of the war shall become warm, if not of our own initiave then out of China's it will surely be, out of eastern Asia, against taiwan to truly have the monopoly on the means of production. Taiwan produces almost all of the semi-conductors on the world, they efectivelly have a monopoly on the most important means of production for technology, in your phone , toaster, tv, spaceships there are semiconductors made in Taiwan. It is of upmost importance to not led Taiwan fall into the hands of the CCP that if we do not want to become the slaves of China. History does not repeat itself but it must certantly rhime!
When history decides to rhime we must be the upmost prepared for the warmness of the war will for it will become the fires of hell and in the flames of hell Europe shall be reborn or forever die.
The continent of Europe is like a self destructive organism of continous 3 stages, evolution(empire building), eating each other(wars of European empires) and deevolution (fall of the empires). This time we are at the devolution stage, the fires of hell shall either force us this time to evolve into one European Empire, one big Commonwealth, one big continental Confederation or forver end the organism(becoming the slaves of China)
Europe from the mystic fires of war shall be reborn, plastered with the blood of heroes, the sorrow of poets and cries of mothers.
After all world wars, beacuse there historiaclly were more than 2 but with other names, one nation is reborn in it's fire and out of the ashes of the world emerges a world power. Take for example world war 1, France and Brittan became The world's most important powers, dominating the world so much that French almost became an international language...but out of cowardness wanting to preserve peace at all costs their empires fell, the peace fell and America became the next global power. Out of the Great war ashes the Hammer and the Sickle was forged out of the russian folk as the Soviet Union. All of this leading to the cold war of which America came on top.
Out of the next great war we must not let China take America's place instead Europe shall be reborn as a superpower, united in it's diversity under a subsidiar technocratic system
Now if you have not caught on yet how my way of approaching or dissagreeing with the European values relate to my darker ineer psyche that manifests politically is that I see war as a means of achiving my technocratic subsidiar system when I loose hope for reform. War here plays the role of acceleration, of destroying the old world values into achiving a new world order dominated by an European Confederacy by an natural procces of acceleration of the dogmas I have explained esspecially peace and democracy as a dogma until they colapse on themselves from dogmatism and lack of pragmatism and vissionary visson. The biggest risk of this aproach is for China to ultimately come on top of the third world war for that we must unite as a continent and ally ourselves but beware of the United States of America for they can easily become traitors if their hegemony feels threatened, all fronts united against the red fascist, modern China. This accelearationism also applies economically for I am a distributism meaning I want the means of production to be as widely spread as possible in the hands of the privates, not oligopolized in the hands of some, monopolised in the hand of the state or monopolised globally by one nation. By destroying China and their industry, their means of production we disrupt the global trade and end economic Globalism but also forcing local industries to evolve and appear achiving the wide spread means of production of distributism but only if the gouverments around the world or more likely an European Confederation adopts an technocratic subsidiar system to give incentives for the privates and to limit their investements inside of the Commonwealth, we should not make the same mistake twicke to move the industry, the investment from China to India for the sake of profits and producing goods as many and as cheaply as possible with questionable to none moral/work ethics or care for the planet.
With this I want to conclude, for the sake of our planet, economies, morality, ration and our way of life we shall become the martyrs for the future generations to not lead to the already passed generations hating us for beeing cowarads and idiots repeating their mistakes and for the future generations to not curse us for giving them an inheritance represented by defacto-slavery of the another nation and the planet destoyed. A wise old man plants trees that he knows he will never rest under their shade, likewise in the flames of hell europe should be reborn with our blood plasstered on it.
Well this took long enough, in the span of like 2 days and more than 6 days of gathering ideas and the necessary state of spirit to writte this.Also this is a must read if you want to understand how such a system might look like, it needs a follow up in the future but until then see my structure. I still am trying to belive that throughout reform we can achive a bettter future not for us but for the future generations, for our future seems a bleak one. If possible to not split too much blood.